![]() ![]() This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. ![]() The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. All these bikes had these springs, except the Sporty which has a cartridge.Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Unless you bike has a cartridge or already has progressive springs this is an inexpensive upgrade and one you can feel. Second opinion is to consider progressive springs up front. I have no experience with the higher grade shocks, so can't comment on just how much improvement there would be. I'd buy the 412s again for my next (if there is one) bike. Cost as a percent of the bike's cost isn't out of line. My opinion? 412s are a great replacement/upgrade on this level bike but would probably go with a higher grade on the higher level bikes. I take the rides pretty easy, my need for speed years are long past. None of these bikes are great tourers but did the job. This was on the Devil's Highway in Arizona and the bike didn't handle the curves too well after that.Įach bike other than the Sportster has been from Arizona to New England and Arizona to Seattle at least once, all over the Colorado mountains, and I don't recall any undue discomfort. The second issue, also on the Dyna, was an oil blowout (shock on the other side). Came home on one shock, roughly 1,000 miles on mostly highways without issue. Only issues ever were on the Dyna, on one trip down the PCH they apparently bottomed out and broke one shock mount bolt. I consider them as what stock shocks should be, nothing spectacular just competent and do what is expected. Yoda, I've had 412's on four bikes, starting with a 1995 Honda 1100 Shadow for 72k miles, '05 VTX for 27k miles, '07 Dyna for 77k miles, and now my '16 Sportster. Or should I just get the 944 and be done with all this nonsense? Does anyone have experience with this? I know they're all better than stock HD air-shocks, but is there that much difference between these three? Will I be pleased with the performance of the 412 or is it less expensive for a reason-it's simply not as good. The price difference with these shocks is quite a lot (944 - $684, 444 - $612, 412 - $270), but is there that much difference between the shocks? I'm assuming yes, but perhaps not. But I ride solo 90% of the time, my sweetie only comes along on occasion. When I ride two-up with my wife we're probably at a combined weight of about 290, plus gear/luggage probably puts us at 320 max. I'm a smaller guy (5'8", 157 lbs.) so I don't think I need a heavy-duty shock, but I don't want to bottom-out either. I've looked at Progressive 944, 444, and 412, they all see to be good replacement shocks, but I don't know if there is that much difference between the three. But I'd rather pay for a more expensive shock then have to deal with bottoming out every time I hit a pothole or go across tracks, etc. I've been looking at Progressives, which from what I've read are amazing-but very expensive. I already replaced the oil in them with a heavier oil and it still didn't make much difference, so I've come to the determination the HD air-shocks are simply a poor design. I'm tired of nearly getting getting my back nearly snapped in half when I ride across railroad tracks on my 2011 Ultra Limited, the HD stock air-shock are complete garbage so it's time to replace them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |